Showing posts with label insects. Show all posts
Showing posts with label insects. Show all posts

Friday, January 28, 2011

News: Nonfiction: Nabokov Theory on Butterfly Evolution Is Vindicated

New York Times
By CARL ZIMMER
Published: January 25, 2011


A male Acmon blue butterfly (Icaricia acmon). Vladimir Nabokov described the Icaricia genus in 1944. In a speculative moment in 1945, he came up with a sweeping hypothesis for the evolution the group of butterflies known as the Polyommatus blues, and 65 years later, DNA analysis has proved it correct.

Vladimir Nabokov may be known to most people as the author of classic novels like “Lolita” and “Pale Fire.” But even as he was writing those books, Nabokov had a parallel existence as a self-taught expert on butterflies.
He was the curator of lepidoptera at the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University, and collected the insects across the United States. He published detailed descriptions of hundreds of species. And in a speculative moment in 1945, he came up with a sweeping hypothesis for the evolution of the butterflies he studied, a group known as the Polyommatus blues. He envisioned them coming to the New World from Asia over millions of years in a series of waves.

Few professional lepidopterists took these ideas seriously during Nabokov’s lifetime. But in the years since his death in 1977, his scientific reputation has grown. And over the past 10 years, a team of scientists has been applying gene-sequencing technology to his hypothesis about how Polyommatus blues evolved. On Tuesday in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, they reported that Nabokov was absolutely right.

“It’s really quite a marvel,” said Naomi Pierce of Harvard, a co-author of the paper.


A male Andean blue butterfly (Madeleinea koa). A new study shows that the ancestors of this species colonized the New World from Asia via Beringia 11 million years ago.

Nabokov inherited his passion for butterflies from his parents. When his father was imprisoned by the Russian authorities for his political activities, the 8-year-old Vladimir brought a butterfly to his cell as a gift. As a teenager, Nabokov went on butterfly-hunting expeditions and carefully described the specimens he caught, imitating the scientific journals he read in his spare time. Had it not been for the Russian Revolution, which forced his family into exile in 1919, Nabokov said that he might have become a full-time lepidopterist.

In his European exile, Nabokov visited butterfly collections in museums. He used the proceeds of his second novel, “King, Queen, Knave,” to finance an expedition to the Pyrenees, where he and his wife, Vera, netted over a hundred species. The rise of the Nazis drove Nabokov into exile once more in 1940, this time to the United States. It was there that Nabokov found his greatest fame as a novelist. It was also there that he delved deepest into the science of butterflies.

Nabokov spent much of the 1940s dissecting a confusing group of species called Polyommatus blues. He developed forward-thinking ways to classify the butterflies based on differences in their genitalia. He argued that what were thought to be closely related species were actually only distantly related.


A male blue butterfly of the genus Lycaeides. The study shows that the ancestors of this species colonized the New World from Asia through Beringia approximately 2.4 million years ago.


At the end of a 1945 paper on the group, he mused on how they had evolved. He speculated that they originated in Asia, moved over the Bering Strait, and moved south all the way to Chile.

Allowing himself a few literary flourishes, Nabokov invited his readers to imagine “a modern taxonomist straddling a Wellsian time machine.” Going back millions of years, he would end up at a time when only Asian forms of the butterflies existed. Then, moving forward again, the taxonomist would see five waves of butterflies arriving in the New World.

Nabokov conceded that the thought of butterflies making a trip from Siberia to Alaska and then all the way down into South America might sound far-fetched. But it made more sense to him than an unknown land bridge spanning the Pacific. “I find it easier to give a friendly little push to some of the forms and hang my distributional horseshoes on the nail of Nome rather than postulate transoceanic land-bridges in other parts of the world,” he wrote.

When “Lolita” made Nabokov a star in 1958, journalists were delighted to discover his hidden life as a butterfly expert. A famous photograph of Nabokov that appeared in The Saturday Evening Post when he was 66 is from a butterfly’s perspective. The looming Russian author swings a net with rapt concentration. But despite the fact that he was the best-known butterfly expert of his day and a Harvard museum curator, other lepidopterists considered Nabokov a dutiful but undistinguished researcher. He could describe details well, they granted, but did not produce scientifically important ideas.

Only in the 1990s did a team of scientists systematically review his work and recognize the strength of his classifications. Dr. Pierce, who became a Harvard biology professor and curator of lepidoptera in 1990, began looking closely at Nabokov’s work while preparing an exhibit to celebrate his 100th birthday in 1999. She was captivated by his idea of butterflies coming from Asia. “It was an amazing, bold hypothesis,” she said. “And I thought, ‘Oh, my God, we could test this.’ ”


The study took eight years and involved collecting samples from Canada to Patagonia. Roger Vila, one of the authors of the study, is shown prospecting in the Cajamarca region of Peru.

To do so, she would need to reconstruct the evolutionary tree of blues, and estimate when the branches split. It would have been impossible for Nabokov to do such a study on the anatomy of butterflies alone. Dr. Pierce would need their DNA, which could provide more detail about their evolutionary history.

Working with American and European lepidopterists, Dr. Pierce organized four separate expeditions into the Andes in search of blues. Back at her lab at Harvard, she and her colleagues sequenced the genes of the butterflies and used a computer to calculate the most likely relationships between them. They also compared the number of mutations each species had acquired to determine how long ago they had diverged from one another.


A greenish blue Icaricia saepiolus waiting for the sun on a dandelion. Its ancestors crossed from Asia to the Americas through Beringia nine million years ago.

There were several plausible hypotheses for how the butterflies might have evolved. They might have evolved in the Amazon, with the rising Andes fragmenting their populations. If that were true, the species would be closely related to one another.


The study confirms Vladimir Nabokov's biogeographic hypothesis for the colonization of the New World by Polyommatus butterflies. They crossed from Asia to the Americas through Beringia at least five times in the last 11 million years.

But that is not what Dr. Pierce found. Instead, she and her colleagues found that the New World species shared a common ancestor that lived about 10 million years ago. But many New World species were more closely related to Old World butterflies than to their neighbors. Dr. Pierce and her colleagues concluded that five waves of butterflies came from Asia to the New World — just as Nabokov had speculated.

“By God, he got every one right,” Dr. Pierce said. “I couldn’t get over it — I was blown away.”

Dr. Pierce and her colleagues also investigated Nabokov’s idea that the butterflies had come over the Bering Strait. The land surrounding the strait was relatively warm 10 million years ago, and has been chilling steadily ever since. Dr. Pierce and her colleagues found that the first lineage of Polyommatus blues that made the journey could survive a temperature range that matched the Bering climate of 10 million years ago. The lineages that came later are more cold-hardy, each with a temperature range matching the falling temperatures.

Nabokov’s taxonomic horseshoes turn out to belong in Nome after all.

"What a great paper," said James Mallet, an expert on butterfly evolution at University College London. "It's a fitting tribute to the great man to see that the most modern methods that technology can deliver now largely support his systematic arrangement."


A group of Polyommatus blue butterflies gathering in humid soil. The study shows that Beringia has served as a biological corridor for their dispersal from Asia into the New World, as is the case with other animals, including humans.

Dr. Pierce says she believes Nabokov would have been greatly pleased to be so vindicated, and points to one of his most famous poems, “On Discovering a Butterfly.” The 1943 poem begins:
I found it and I named it, being versed

in taxonomic Latin; thus became

godfather to an insect and its first

describer — and I want no other fame.
“He felt that his scientific work was standing for all time, and that he was just a player in a much bigger enterprise,” said Dr. Pierce. “He was not known as a scientist, but this certainly indicates to me that he knew what it’s all about.”

Monday, October 27, 2008

脛蹼琵蟌 Copera marginipes

2008/09/18


脛蹼琵蟌 ♀ (未熟)
Copera marginipes Rambur, 1842 ( immature)

桃園銘傳的辦公室 2008/09/18 下午, 飛進一隻脛蹼琵蟌, 翻遍汪良仲寫的這本『台灣的蜻蛉』, 勉強找到 p. 128 的 脛蹼琵蟌 ♀ (未熟) 這張照片比較像。書中描述本種分布在台灣全島 500 公尺以下的低海拔地區, 成蟲出現在 4 - 12 月。看起來頗像會闖入別人辦公室的常見品種。

Friday, October 24, 2008

細剪斯 Euconocephalus pallides

2008/10/12





這隻細剪斯 (Euconocephalus pallides) 是2008/10/12 晚上在社區地下室 B1 發現的。
相關的生態資料可以在張永仁的『昆蟲圖鑑 2 』p. 40 找到。

 
 

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Neolucanus swinhoei Bates 紅圓翅鍬形蟲


紅圓翅鍬形蟲 ♀ (Neolucanus swinhoei Bates, 1866)
桃園龜山銘傳大學 (2008/10/14)

今天早上到桃園校區上課, 才剛停好車, 就在路旁的蟛蜞菊上發現這隻紅圓翅鍬形蟲 (Neolucanus swinhoei Bates, 1866) 的雌蟲, 連忙拿出相機記錄。
 

Monday, March 24, 2008

Book: 東京昆蟲物語

這本書已經買了一年多了, 兩個星期前將這本書放到床頭, 每天隨手讀個一兩篇短文, 到今天讀完 46 則故事。閱讀這本書, 總會讓我想起自己與昆蟲為伍的那段日子, 算是很不錯的閱讀時光。

 東京昆蟲物語的圖像
底下是我寫在 aNobii 的書評:
這本書是在東京居住的作者, 憑著與周遭昆蟲遭遇的印象, 寫成的散文集, 是一本非常適合僅有短暫時間下的閱讀選擇。46 則不同的昆蟲印象, 有些也會出現在我們週遭, 閱讀時也會讓我想起自己與這些昆蟲的遭遇情景。書中的每一幅昆蟲圖 畫, 我也都非常喜歡, 這也是我當初買這本書的原因之一呢 !

 
 大波紋蛇目蝶
 

Sunday, May 27, 2007

News: 發現失蹤七十年的神秘甲蟲-中林氏埋葬蟲

中林氏埋葬蟲 Oiceoptoma nakabayashii (Miwa, 1937)

台灣國家公園 新聞原始網址連結

1937 年驚鴻一瞥後已失蹤七十年的神秘甲蟲–中林氏埋葬蟲 Oiceoptoma nakabayashii (Miwa, 1937) ,近期在太魯閣國家公園又被發現。太魯閣國家公園管理處為了進一步瞭解太魯閣國家公園的昆蟲多樣性及其生態角色,於民國 95 年進行研究,在中央山脈 2500 公尺以上的高海拔地帶發現牠的蹤跡,這種埋葬蟲最初是由日籍學者三輪勇四郎根據單獨一隻標本記述命名的,但是在命名之後便沒有人再觀察到這種埋葬蟲。

本項研究案是由太魯閣國家公園管理處委託,研究團隊包含:國立台灣師範大學生命科學系徐堉峰教授及國立台灣大學昆蟲學系楊平世教授所屬研究室,並再邀請國立成功大學李奇峰教授及國立中山大學顏聖紘教授分別協助甲蟲與蛾類之鑑定工作。並由李奇峰教授將這項發現告知英國自然史博物館著名的甲蟲學者 Maxwell V. L. Barclay 後,這位學者也大為驚訝且十分興奮。

主持人徐堉峰教授指出,中林氏埋葬蟲因為在原記載之後便沒有任何報告提及此蟲,因此所有的鞘翅目分類學家均質疑此種的存在的真實性;由於此屬的種類均分布於舊北區,即只分佈在歐洲、蘇聯、中國大陸北部、韓國、日本的寒冷的地區,實在令人懷疑台灣會有此類的甲蟲。

此種埋葬蟲第一次發現是在玉山上,這項事實已暗示牠可能只棲息在高海拔的山區,但這類甲蟲只有用動物屍體誘集才能獲得,而過去無人會到這麼高海拔的地方還用這種陷阱進行調查,這可能是這種珍奇甲蟲失蹤七十年的緣由。這次的研究證實此種甲蟲確實棲息在於台灣的高山上,足證這類的生物多樣性研究值得鼓勵,以進一步瞭解寶島豐富多彩的生物相。

太魯閣國家公園管理處於 5 月 25 日將辦理「95 年度保育研究計畫成果發表會」,會中除了發表 14 篇動植物、兩生類、環境變遷及國家公園效益等研究論文外,並特別邀請鑑定中林氏埋葬蟲的學者李奇峰教授與會,正式發表這項調查成果。未來也將更進一步與英國學者共同進一步研究中林氏埋葬蟲的生態習性以填補這一片寶島生物學資料的空白。

Sunday, May 13, 2007

初生的紫斑蝶幼蟲

New arrival caterpillar
2007/05/12 一早發現紫斑蝶卵變的透明, 隱約看到一個小黑點, 因為急著帶 Ernest 去上畫畫課, 所以沒有拍照, 中午回來發現幼蟲已經出生且把卵殼吃掉了, 僅留下一點點痕跡在葉子上!
 

Saturday, May 12, 2007

產卵的紫斑蝶

徘徊產卵的紫斑蝶

2007/05/09 結束了早上的四堂課, 在回家路上經過階梯旁的榕樹下, 觀察到一隻在榕樹旁徘徊不去的紫斑蝶。

紫斑蝶卵

沒多久就觀察到牠在榕葉新芽上產了一顆卵。後來, 這顆卵被我採集回家, 希望可以飼養成一隻蝴蝶。
 

Wasp Nest 家長腳蜂的巢

Wasp
2007/05/09 星期三, 我的課在台北校區, 在隔壁教室上課的 李開暉 教授發現了一個 家長腳蜂 (Polistes jadwigae, 胡蜂科) 的巢, 就築在走廊盡頭飲水機旁窗台上小盆栽所種的二葉松上。

昆蟲圖鑑的圖像
 
家長腳蜂在張永仁寫的『昆蟲圖鑑』是這樣描述的: 家長腳蜂是都市最常見的長腳蜂, 個性溫和, 不會主動攻擊人, 常在樹叢或建築物屋簷築巢。
 

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

厲椿若蟲

厲椿若蟲

自從上次採集紫斑蝶卵後, 每週三上午到台北校區上課, 經過那棵榕樹時, 就會多看兩眼, 希望可以找到紫斑蝶的幼蟲, 2007/04/25 這天, 看到了這隻厲椿(Eocanthecona)的若蟲。心想: 如果樹上還有紫斑蝶幼蟲, 應該也會被牠吸食光吧!2003/07/01 我就曾經在含笑花的葉片上觀察到一隻厲椿若蟲在捕食青斑鳳蝶幼蟲。

厲椿若蟲
2003/07/01

Friday, April 27, 2007

端紫斑蝶幼蟲 Caterpillar of Euploea mulciber barsine

從校園採集回來的紫斑蝶卵, 陸續拍了一些照片, 昨晚整理放上 Flickr ...

Caterpillar 端紫斑蝶初齡幼蟲
2007/04/16, 3:44PM
經過了 5 天, 蝶卵已經孵化了, 全身晶瑩剔透!

Caterpillar 二齡幼蟲
2007/04/17, 8:13PM
蛻下一層皮變成二齡了。很快地, 他會轉身將蛻下的皮吃掉!

Caterpillar 端紫斑蝶幼蟲
2007/04/19, 10:40PM
拍照時, 活動力很強, 曾經一度往位於水面下的枝幹爬去, 我連忙拉起。

Caterpillar 端紫斑蝶幼蟲
2007/04/19, 10:43PM
在葉背稍做休息。

Caterpillar
2007/04/19, 11:59PM
在我不注意時, 毛蟲還是溺斃了!

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

紅邊黃小灰蝶 Heliophorus ila matsumurae Fruhstorfer

Heliophorus ila matsumurae Fruhstorfer

2007/4/18 這天到台北校區上課, 一早就在教室外的牆上看到這隻紅邊黃小灰蝶 ( Heliophorus ila matsumurae Fruhstorfer ), 於是用隨身攜帶的相機拍下。紅邊黃小灰蝶幼蟲的食草為蓼科的火炭母草 ( Polygonum chinense L.)。

Friday, April 13, 2007

A Butterfly Egg

A Butterfly Egg

已經連續下了好幾天的雨, 2007/04/11 這天陽光終於露臉。中午在台北校區下課時, 在校園看到一隻紫斑蝶繞著榕樹產卵, 要拍照才發現記憶卡不在數位相機中, 於是將其中一個卵連葉帶回, 準備飼養。

Friday, April 06, 2007

Zizeeria Maha okinawana 沖繩小灰蝶

Zizeeria Maha okinawana 沖繩小灰蝶

2007/03/30 從學校回到竹圍已經下午六點多了, 看到路旁花台上有一隻沖繩小灰蝶 (Zizeeria Maha okinawana) 正在休息, 準備過夜了, 便拿起相機隨手拍下。

Saturday, November 25, 2006

Jamides bochus formosanus 琉璃波紋小灰蝶

Jamides bochus formosanus

Jamides bochus formosanus

這星期學校期中考停課, 星期三(2006/11/22)這天不用上課, 小孩也是上半天課, 所以我們全家到淡水老街末端的香料廚房用餐!用完餐在路旁葛藤叢中, 發現一群琉璃波紋小灰蝶在陽光中飛舞著, 仔細一看, 原來都忙著在葛藤(Pueraria montana)花苞旁產卵, 因此, 趁機拍了幾張照片。
 

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

Torenia concolor & Notocrypta curvifascia 倒地蜈蚣與黑弄蝶

Torenia concolor & Notocrypta curvifascia
這是 2006/07/21 下午在陽明山二子坪步道拍的, 黑弄蝶(Notocrypta curvifascia)吸著倒地蜈蚣(Torenia concolor)的花蜜...


想聽聽走在步道中, 聽到的聲音嗎? 把喇叭打開, 按播放鍵吧!
 

Monday, March 06, 2006

Opiothoplatia orientalis 東方水蠊



Ernest 生日那晚, 我們在院子裏找青蛙, 看到了這隻 東方水蠊 (Opiothoplatia orientalis), 其實牠和小強一樣, 同屬蜚蠊目(Blattaria)。腹部兩側是紅色的, 在小強一族中, 算是漂亮的了!